The French Dreyfus Affair transposed into nuclear and inflicted to Tommaso Fronte

I was fired because I reported irregularities and refused to subscribe to violations of nuclear safety rules...

PUNISHMENT:
...ten years of unemployment , condemned by four rulings which were confirmed by the criminal section of the Supreme court

This training course, normally planned over six months, has been regarded by the Employement agency as an «intensive support»...

... a room with a Marianne’s photo (the People’s symbol in France) and then an interview with questions such as: - Have you been in jail, are you going to be jailed ? Have you a permanent residence?......

Saint Leu , the 30th July 2007

Monsieur le Président de la République

Sir,

let see an actual way of « getting rid of the rabble », an approach that you promoted on the Slab of Argenteuil, a renowned difficult suburb of Paris (France).

In the case hereafter, I am the raffle, ten years of unemployment , condemned by four judgments which were confirmed by the criminal section of the Supreme court . The Slab of Argenteuil is the location of the training course imposed by the Employment agency (ANPE) so that I could possibly find a job.

This training course, normally planned over six months, has been regarded by the Employement agency as an « intensive support», but I could attend only the welcome : a room with a Marianne’s photo (the People’s symbol in France) and then an interview with questions such as: - Have you been in jail, are you going to be jailed ? Have you a permanent residence?... When the manager in charge of me knew my professional project he stopped dead , he spent two weeks to contact the appropriate athorities , then he called for me and asked me to abandon my past activities.

- Abandoning my past activities would be a cowardice a fault an inconsistency, underlined I.

I was fired because I reported irregularities and refused to subscribe to violations of nuclear safety rules. The Administration wanted to suffocate the irregularities in order to protect the reputation of AREVA, the French state-owned nuclear power manufacturer. I thus became the victim of the same practices as in the famed Dreyfus affair , i.e. libelous witnesses, faked trials, dishonorable sanctions, seizures of goods and so on. Ten years later, the irregularities are known at every levels up to the presidency of the Republic and are not settled.
If I modified my professional project to leave nuclear power plants I would join the reckless community of those who in front of safety problems become deaf , stay silent and see only their interest.

The manager in charge for the training course remained firm: - No support for your professional project in the nuclear power.

The Employment agency send me a Warning before Radiation on grounds of the fact that I refused to modify my professional project, despite the supposedly « intensive support ».

I was excluded from the Slab of Argenteuil and my name will be excluded from the list of job candidates .

In a sense, I am confined in a penal colony and I am going to be deprived of ration.

Is this a permessible method of « getting rid of riffraff » considering also that this will improve chances of covering up the violations of the International Convention on Nuclear Safety and the breaches of Human Rights by prominent organisations?

Thank you for your answer, if any.

Regards
Tommaso FRONTE